Showing posts with label Alinsky. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alinsky. Show all posts
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Closing Arguments
A perfectly pithy end to the last four years of political madness inflicted upon the republic by the Left.
"You didn't build that" and Barry's Mob of Maladjusted Malcontents is here to take "revenge" on you for it. "Hope and Change" was "Envy and Lawlessnes" all along. Some of us already knew that.
Update 11/6/2012
Votin' Day!
Conservative cartoonist Eric Allie neatly captures the Alinskyite bait and switch that was perpetrated on the republic in 2008. Today is the day of the correction.
Posted by
LibertyAtStake
at
11:18 AM
Closing Arguments
2012-11-04T11:18:00-05:00
LibertyAtStake
2012 Election|Alinsky|Obama|
Comments
Labels:
2012 Election,
Alinsky,
Obama
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Weekly Status Report
Astute readers of this blog have surely noticed the rate of
postings here has dramatically declined during this month of June 2012. There are several factors at play.
First, there is the professional dimension. I have been nominated by my boss for two
project rescues in a row. I’ve been
doing some big cat herding lately for pay, which means the pro bono blogging
needed to take a back seat.
The first rescue is a classic case of a junior Project Manager
(the one I replaced) following the form of the administrative process and
exercising zero leadership. Throw in a
notoriously difficult executive stakeholder he lacked the chops to go
toe-to-toe with, and overworked developers hiding under their desks as a
survival response … and people were beginning to notice he couldn’t even
baseline a schedule anybody could trust.
The schedule is now base-lined and under my change management
control. The executive stakeholder is
sure to continue to be a pain in the a$$ - it’s who she is - but we understand
each other now. I have the attention of
the developers, and visible work product is now being created.
The most interesting relationship on this one looks like it
will be with the customer relationship manager.
She’s one of those high-strung obsessive compulsives who likes to tell
people what to do in minute detail. For
example, on Friday I had no choice but to put an end to an extended email
thread with this: “How many ways are there to say something was written, will
be reviewed, and then approved? Point of
diminishing returns reached. J.” We’re working together as a team just fine so
far.
The root cause for the second rescue is the complete
opposite. It was driven into the ground
by a know-it-all senior engineer that communicated nothing to no one before
unveiling what she assumed was a production ready system to the entire
enterprise. Needless to say … a highly
visible crash and burn was the result. I
had the kickoff meeting for the restart this past Friday, to assert my
dominance over a managed iterative delivery process. The key stakeholders are meeting with me on Monday
to elaborate the scope for delivery iteration 1.
The interesting twist on this one is my boss is a key
stakeholder, another is his political rival, who oversaw the disaster, and the
executive stakeholder is boss to both of them.
Should be loads of fun.
==
My personal life has also required a good deal of attention
to detail lately. This is not the space
to go into further detail.
So, that’s it … the report from the brick and mortar world;
the oxygen, carbon dioxide, and H2O world; explaining the blog’s diminished
pace for delivering the conservative rants my loyal readership has enjoyed
since December 2009.
==
But, even with these real world considerations, the plain fact is the need for this blog’s mission – “Because the only good Progressive is a
failed Progressive” – is disappearing before our very eyes. By this standard, the Empty Suit Known as Barack Hussein Obama is on a rocket slide
toward becoming the best Progressive ever.
The economy still sucks and even gives signs of turning
downward again. This condition is due to
the Progressive and Keynesian policy program inflicted upon the republic by the
Alinskyite Socialist in the White House:
tax, spend, borrow, and zealously regulate. When these policies are reversed, by his
removal from office, an economic boom will be touched off as trillions of
spooked investment dollars currently on the sidelines come roaring back into
the economy at large.
Iran’s nuclear weapons program continues apace, due to Barry’s
typically defeatist and inert Progressive approach to foreign affairs. Lucky for western civilization Israel is
under management that has no delusions about the need to defend itself. If and when Israel does what it needs to do,
this will not be good political news for the Empty Suit that Began His Worldwide Apology Tour with His Islamic
Appeasement Speech in Cairo.
Speaking of Cairo, and naïve Progressive notions about the
world at large, the so-called Egyptian ‘Arab Spring’ has resulted in the
election of a President beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). That’s not the Islamic Shriners, by the way …
more like the Islamic MS13. IMHO, it is
fortunate for western civilization that the professional Egyptian Army, very
Americanized due to close military-to-military relations for decades, has
assumed the powers of the dissolved parliament that was also MB dominated after
popular elections. If the MB wins this
power struggle with the Army brass, Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel will be worthless,
and there will likely be war in the Sinai desert. We need new management in DC willing to back
the Egyptian Army for the cause of peace.
Returning back to the domestic scene, the #OccupyWhatever
mob, behind whom Barry foolishly threw his prestige and sympathy, has reached
the stage of terminal irrelevance.
Despite the corrupt and biased liberal media’s best efforts, the
#OccupyWhatever mob shall be accurately recorded by history as not much more
than a garden variety youth gang crime wave.
Unofficially funded by the Democrat party, that is.
==
Well, you get the picture … Jimmy Carter writ large, for
those of you old enough to remember that national disaster - with a side of
Saul Alinksy for an extra kick. Botton
line: there is not a snowball’s chance in hell Barry gets re-elected. Part 26 of the “Newton’s Three Law’s” series
will explain further. LAS has been collecting
links to collate into Part 26. It’s not
hard. All I have to do is browse my way
down my blog roll and the myriad of epic failures attributable to the
Progressive in the White House jump out at me, as does the growing awareness of
the American public, despite the mass hoodwinking being attempted by the corrupt and
biased liberal media.
I twice abandoned this month a Jack Wiley Dithers piece,
lacking the capacity to fully draft and edit it. Earlier in the month, when the Campaigner-In-Chief was jetting off on
Air Force One to west coast fundraisers while ignoring the D-Day anniversary, I
had an idea for a desperate private campaign meeting on the airplane captured
by a JWD operative … a flight attendant plant brought on to the JWD payroll for
her … ahem .. unique assets. Later in
the month the idea morphed into a long string of desperate campaign
conservations captured by a recording device injected into Barry’s favorite
basketball … delayed by tedious editing required to remove all the background
noise … you know, with all the dribbling.
Try to hang on a little while longer patriots, adult supervision
will be coming back to DC soon.
Update 6/27/2012
The old conservative standby, American Spectator, has an excellent blog posting today fleshing out the adult view of conditions in Egypt.
| Share the genius : | Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook |
Posted by
LibertyAtStake
at
7:25 PM
Weekly Status Report
2012-06-24T19:25:00-04:00
LibertyAtStake
#Occupy|2012 Election|Alinsky|Demotivational|Economy|MSM|Obama|Social Media|
Comments
Labels:
#Occupy,
2012 Election,
Alinsky,
Demotivational,
Economy,
MSM,
Obama,
Social Media
Monday, June 4, 2012
Stick a Fork in Him, He’s Done
I recall Gorilla Monsoon using this stock phrase a lot in the eighties, when he announced for the World Wrestling Federation (WWF). Monsoon was straight man to Bobby “The Brain” Heenan (aka “The Weasel”) in what was really a LOL wrestling commentary comedy team at the time.
Here’s a taste:
Anyway, Monsoon, while calling a match, would often say ‘stick a fork in him, he’s done!’ – especially when a favored superstar would put away a jobber opponent with a signature move. This phrase was awakened from the deep recesses of my mind when I applied Friday’s dismal jobs report to the electoral future for the Empty Suit Known as Barack Hussein Obama.
I have a mental image of the realities of market economics body splashing into Barry O’Bama from the top rope as Heenan (always favoring the ‘heel’ in ring match ups by design) yells ‘oh no!’ and Monsoon gives us his charcoal grilling related cliché.
==
As we all know, since James “The Crazy Cajun” (that would be his pro wrestling persona) Carville told us in 1992, ‘It’s the economy, stupid’ when it comes to a sitting President’s re-election fortunes.
Well, the economy sucks. It sucks due to Barack Hussein Obama’s policies.
BHO is a dyed-in-the-wool statist who believes the state is the sole source of wisdom, wealth and well-being. His hard Left ideology fundamentally holds individuals, private institutions (i.e. institutions not under the state’s thumb), and the free market in contempt. This ideology assumes all of you are too stupid and too selfish to live a properly ordered life without the state dictating and mandating even the tiniest aspects of how you lead it. Mayor Nanny Bloomberg and his war on soft drinks in servings larger than 16 ounces is but one recent example.
==
BHO took this ideology into office flying high on Icarus-like wings given to him by the republic’s bout with temporary insanity over the empty slogan ‘Hope and Change’. The hype only encouraged the inexperienced narcissist to tack hard left, too close to the sun if you will, and the result is now he is nothing more historically than yet another cautionary tale about the folly of statist economics. He and his corrupt gang of American Progressives join the Soviets, Maoists, Euro Zone Socialists, and others, as prime examples of how command driven cradle-to-grave nanny state economies inevitably spread the most misery to the largest number of people.
==
This blog project set out in December 2009 to make the case against this ideology – you know, “Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive.” 245 posts later (counting this one), by far the most read post, according to Google Analytics, was posted August 27, 2011 – “In a Democracy, the People Get the Government They Deserve.” It’s one the better examples of the quirky, intentionally humorous (in a sarcastic way), intentionally Obama-mocking (in an intentionally Alinskyite way), literary style I developed here. I especially like the concluding visual of the ‘Deserve’ post, as a pithy statement of where we’ve come since the last Presidential election. It is an image of somebody else’s bumper sticker with the statement “If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you are not racist, you’ll have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you’re not an idiot.”
But the best LAS post to explain why the economy still sucks this far into BHO’s so-called recovery is “Stuck on Keynesian Stupid” – posted here on May 11, 2011. The following excerpt is the meat of the matter.
Keynesian economics is a top down, centrally managed, command driven, theory that assumes "experts" can direct capital where it is most needed in a complex market system. Hayek’s competing framework is a bottom up model based on the idea that trusting individuals to make independent decisions in their own self-interest produces the most good for the greatest number of people.
According the macro-economic theories of John Maynard Keynes, the $862 Billion stimulus package that was BHO’s first significant act should have had the US economy humming along beautifully by now. According to the theory, public “experts” pumping huge amounts of public cash into the private economy revitalizes the private economy - and BHO's stimulus was the biggest money pump in human history.
It didn’t work in the Great Depression of the 1930’s, it didn’t work for Japan in the 1990’s, and it’s not working now. The reason it never works is the false premise that government money pumped into the private economy is somehow “new” to the economy. A moment’s reflection exposes the fallaciousness of this premise. Governments only have two ways to raise revenue: (1) print new paper money, which is not actually new wealth, and is therefore inflationary (unless interest rates are artificially held down - which is the building stress fracture in US monetary policy right now), or (2) tax existing wealth out the private economy – which merely redistributes wealth from one set of private hands to another, with overhead built into the transfer to fund the government intervention itself. Governments simply produce no new wealth, ever.
Hayek, on the other hand, based his macroeconomic theories on the far more subtle notion of spontaneous order. That is, for my purposes here, the complex system of exchange between self-interested consumers and producers does something truly magical – it actually creates new wealth in the economic system merely via the exercise of economic activity. Every time a producer supplies a valuable product or service to a consumer, the fair market value the consumer provides back in exchange is economic activity. When government policy encourages and rewards economic activity, over time it results in measurable economic growth, which is good to one degree or another for everyone.
I then went on, in a spasm of pure genius, to set up a direct measurement of real world results comparing and contrasting the economic performance of the Leftist Obama with the man who won the Cold War without firing a shot.
It turns out our 40th President – Ronald Reagan - implemented policies inspired by the Hayek school of thought. It also turns out Mr. Reagan “inherited” a deep recession very similar to the one Mr. Obama told us at the beginning of his term he would fix with his Keynesian Stimulus package.==
The Wall Street Journal recently compared the growth in GDP during the two officially measured “recoveries,” and found Messrs. Keynes and Obama to be lagging Messrs. Hayek and Reagan considerably. I took the Journal’s numbers, covering the first seven quarters of official “recovery,” and captured them in a very sophisticated charting system known as MS Excel. Here’s the chart for quarters one through seven. (I think I’ll bring this chart back, updated, each quarter moving forward. The trend will not change, trust me on that.)
Here’s the updated chart, folks. Hint: Longer is better.
BHO and His Corrupt Gang of Progressives are Keynesian statists through and through. These plainly measurable results mean nothing to them. They are sooooooooo stuck on Keynesian stupid their only policy proposals seem to be stuff like tax credits for businesses to hire for the mere sake of hiring and “targeted infrastructure” spending.
AYFKM?
The first proposal belies a complete lack of understanding of how the market economy works. There is no tax break big enough to convince any business to hire someone to sit on their hands. Businesses hire when they grow, and a legitimate internal demand for help develops. When such need develops, there is no tax break small enough to deter the hiring transaction. The employee that costs more than he or she creates in revenue has a label – “layoff” - unless they’ve scored a public sector union gub’ment position of course, at least up until now (oblique reference to tomorrow’s historic Wisconsin recall referendum).
The infrastructure thing is so LOL funny it’s sad. The only beneficiaries are a narrow band of specially trained, union connected, construction laborers. Trust me, they are already busy. Every f*ck*in exit on the DC Beltway has a construction project that never seems to finish, snarling traffic like only Communists could. The unions really screwed up when they became a giant pain in the a$$ for everybody else.
One more time, just to make sure it sinks in …
Footnote
The staff cartoonist has been given his assignment.
| Share the genius : | Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook |
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
How Stupid *is* My Republic?
The April 4th update to my April 3rd post captured a theme that will no doubt make a strong contribution to
LAS likes how Limbaugh is explaining Barry's erratic, hyperbolic, and cynical statements of late. It is an open electoral appeal to the truly ignorant and dumb. So, that's it then ... 2012 will demonstrate just how dumb my republic has finally become. Dumb enough to re-elect a failed demagogue? We shall see.
The answer to the question is not at all clear. The Empty Suit Known as Barack Hussein Obama has a truly sorry record … but is also protected by the praetorian guard of sycophantic propagandists known as the mainstream media. As we established at the outset of this blog project, the American electorate naturally identifies with conservative governing policies (hint: generally the opposite of BHO’s), but doesn’t actually realize this mostly because they are largely apolitical (or, more to the point, not informed about political ideologies). The majority of Americans walking into that voting booth on 11/06/12 will be making a choice between two alternatives they have barely spent any time examining, and about which they are mostly misinformed. And the fate of the republic hangs in the balance this time around. Oh joy.
On the plus side, conservative new media has arisen to do the corrupt and biased old media’s job for it, and is arguably at least an even match now in the information wars. The sure evidence is Rush Limbaugh’s increased ratings in the face of Team Leftie’s coordinated ‘Krieg auf Frauen Blitzkrieg” against his advertisers.
==
So, we have a non-ideological voting base, not inclined to do the homework to become informed ideologically, making a choice between an incumbent determined to hide his true hard Left ideology, and a GOP challenger who is inarticulate when talking about the alternative ideology. Furthermore, the incumbent is slavishly propped up by fellow travelers in the old media, and the challenger is promoted by a conservative new media not out of any love for the candidate but out of concern for the future of the republic.
A few top level observations regarding the odds making on this one …
1 - Conservative new media will have to work harder than the sclerotic dinosaurs in the corrupt and biased old media newsrooms. I have no doubt this will happen in an absolute sense … conservative new media is generally younger, smarter, and driven by a patriotic fervor. The opposition is represented by hacks like Chris ‘Tingles’ Matthews. But it remains an open question whether or not conservative new media will outwork the old media hacks by enough to reach enough of those so-called ‘independent’ voters who will remain on the couch with cheeto-stained fingertips until a week or so before the election. We shall see.
2 – Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney cannot make the mistake the GOP Establishment’s 2008 nominee made … the mistake of treating Team Leftie’s quota candidate with kid gloves. Early signs are actually OK on this one, but Romney will need constant prodding from grass roots conservatives to stay on track. At his core, the GOP Establishment nominee is a country club Republican, tailor made to be demonized by the class warfare campaign tactics of BHO’s Billion Dollar Slime Machine. Can Mittens run a campaign slightly outside his comfort zone in order to win it? We shall see.
3 – Can the American electorate direct righteous anger where it belongs? The Alinksy playbook being executed by Team Obama calls for riling up mob passions with the politics of envy, and putting your mob into action on behalf of your agenda - laws and public safety be damned. Occupy Wall Street is a perfect example, though that one doesn’t seem to working out so well for BHO and His Corrupt Gang of Progressives. The TEA Party movement is an example of the opposite – the *Taxed Enough Already* patriots mean what they say, say what they mean, work within the legal bounds of the existing system, and are the very model of law and order at every assembly. But, due to shamelessly biased portrayals by old media, I’ll bet you will get the wrong answer more often than not asking the average citizen which one is responsible for thousands of arrests, dozens of rapes, injury to countless police officers, and an unknown (but huge) cost in property damage. I have no doubt future historians will identify the corruptly biased coverage of these two movements as the real beginning of the end for old media. However, I’m afraid the misrepresentations will live on until the election, which is what matters now. Up against this calculated old media misrepresentation is the reality the electorate is living as a result of BHO’s sorry record. Will the average American voter place more credence in the policy wreckage unfolding before his very eyes, or the Alinskyite narrative spun by BHO with the help of old media? We shall see.
==
However I look at this question, I always come back to realizing the fate of the republic depends on conservative new media communicating Obama’s true record and true policy intentions.
Obama’s foreign policy is a disaster, but I don’t think it will come home to roost before the next election. Of course, I could be wrong … and if it does, it will be ‘game over’ a la Jimmy Carter.
I won’t shy away from covering Barry’s foreign policy wreckage in future posts. Nor will any other opinionator in conservative new media, no doubt. But the point here is the focus for winning this election has to be on opening the citizenry’s eyes to the misery BHO’s policies have directly visited upon them in their lives and neighborhoods.
When Barry runs around falsely claiming the economy is turning around because the officially measured unemployment rate has ‘ticked down’ from 8.2% to 8.1%, we need to relentlessly barrage the republic with the counter-points:
* These are the same geniuses who told us in 2009 their program was necessary to keep unemployment from ever getting above 8%.
* These hacks already hold the record for the longest stretch of official unemployment above 8% since the Great Depression
* The officially measured number goes *down* when a sufficient number of people become so discouraged they leave the work force altogether and are no longer counted as “looking for work,” and that explains the present measurement.
* 115,000 or so jobs created in a given month isn’t a gain against zero, it’s lost ground on needed growth. You need 200,000 per month just to keep up with new labor market entrants (aka graduates), and 400,000 per month (Reagan strength) to get back down to 4-5%.
* At 63.6%, we are at the lowest percentage of working age Americans actually working since 1981. (That would be Carter’s ‘malaise’ economy).
* Household income is down, way down, under Obama.
Oh, just watch this Bloomberg video for a taste of the numbers behind Barry’s economic fail …
==
And a little mockery doesn’t hurt the cause either. The mention of BHO’s latest call for more gub’ment ‘stimulus’ spending in the Bloomberg video brought back to mind this cartoon on the Townhall site, and my comment to it.
==
The bottom line is this: the only answer Team Obama has to the question ‘Are you better off than four years ago?’ is ‘No, but …’ The ‘but’ boils down to whining about their ‘inheritance’ from George Bush. That is something I’m sure will play poorly with the typical American. Americans do not like or respect whiners. Conservative new media must facilitate opportunities for Team Obama to answer this question as often as possible. Lord knows the fawning sycophants at CBS, NBC, and ABC certainly won’t.
And in the process we will discover how stupid my republic actually is.
Footnote
I just realized the finished product looks very little like the notes I was keeping (see footnote to yesterday’s post). That happens sometimes.
Update
Clumsy lead sentence cleanup with strike-through notation. I asked me for a budget to hire copy editors, but me remembered project revenue is stuck at zero.
| Share the genius : | Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook |
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
We’re All Mittens Men Now
So, Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney will now most certainly be the GOP nominee for President in 2012.
It is conventional wisdom in DC that Democrats “fall in love” with their nominees and Republicans “fall in line” behind their nominees. That’s because the Republican Party is the political home for conservatives and the Democrat Party is the political arm of the Looney Left. Another political bromide goes something like “conservatives see the world as it is and ask why, liberals imagine a world that could be and ask why not.”
Ipso facto, when the Left wins big (such as in 2008), the country gets big changes. And it doesn’t always work out so well. Witness the country’s deranged swoon for the Empty Suit Known as Barack Hussein Obama four years ago … and the wreckage that has been visited upon the republic in the years since.
Hell, the wreckage is so obvious to the most casual observer by now, even the Empty Suit’s well-heeled water carriers at the New York Times are making the LOL promise to vet the Saul Alinsky radical this time around – four years and more than five trillion dollars of new national debt too late, that is! Thanks, but no thanks, hacks. You are officially obsolete with this admission of total corruption and incompetence. Then again, these are the same geniuses who are just now figuring out their gilded dinosaur “defined benefit” retirement plans are not sustainable for a commercial enterprise. But I digress (again).
==
The point is, those of us in the conservative coalition need to get completely behind Romney, now that he is the sure GOP nominee, and do everything possible to help him defeat the Saul Alinsky radical in the White House. Any other position is fundamentally un-conservative. To be conservative is first and foremost to see the world as it is. Four more years of this inept and radical left wing governance from BHO and His Corrupt Gang of Progressives would be a complete disaster for the republic. Not casting a vote , or throwing away your vote on a quixotic 3rd party candidate, because Mittens isn’t the perfect conservative, is as good as voting for the Saul Alinsky radical. That’s how the system works. To be conservative is to understand when it is time to suck it up, hitch up the big boy pants, and cooperate to graduate. (Flag thrown for cliché abuse) This is such a time.
Those who decry the selection of Mittens as a victory for the Establishment GOP over the grass roots conservative uprising (commonly labeled the TEA Party movement, but more broadly identified as the Conservative Ascendancy on this blog) … miss the point. The GOP is being enriched and enlivened by the TEA Party movement from the ground up. 2012 will add to the movement’s gains in the US House, US Senate, and state and local offices across the nation. If you thought ‘Shellacking I’ was something to behold, you are going to love the ashen looks on the faces of the liberal political and media elite when they wake up after ‘Shellacking II’ to a world with the Donkey Party out of power on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. We will get our President in due time.
Romney is a decent and smart guy. He is smart enough to know he will be accountable to the movement’s priorities, and (even more fundamentally important at this turn) decent enough to respect the limits of the constitution in office. Do you have a better (achievable) option on the table? I don’t see one. The Establishment GOP can have one more Presidential nominee, if that’s the means to the all important end of defeating the Saul Alinsky radical in the White House. The Conservative Ascendancy is not going anywhere after BHO’s defeat. And don’t you think Mittens will be infinitely easier to keep in line than BHO?
So, that's it, we’re all Mittens men now.
==
In that spirit, I will offer some advice to the new GOP standard bearer. It basically boils down to this … run hard against Obama’s *record* … simply because it *sucks*. If it were a straight up contest on records, a #2 pencil would be favored over Barry.
But, of course, we all know Team Leftie will turn the campaign into a cartoon to distract us from Barry's sorry record. It will resemble something along the lines of Hannah Barbara’s Wacky Racers.
No worries, though, Mittens - conservative new media has your back as far as neutralizing BHO’s Billion Dollar Slime Machine. The doggie wars are a mere taste of what to expect (pun intended). We The People are better at the snark, better at turning Alinsky’s rule book against the Empty Suit, than you can ever be, anyway. Let us handle that part. You should ignore the food fight, just be yourself, and make it your campaign’s mission to use every precious moment to hammer Obama on his record. Just keep running down the checklist relentlessly. The reckless spending and unsustainable debt curve … the lousy economy … the cynical refusal to pass a budget for three years … the total lack of leadership on entitlement reform, our nation’s number one fiscal menace.
Oh, and don’t forget Alinsky’s Rule 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.“ Which leads me to my next specific recommendation … tap Paul Ryan as your VP. He’s way better than any of us at talking about all that fiscal stuff. And Team Leftie will have a much harder time making a straw man mockery of their cartoon version of the “Ryan Plan” if we have the straw man himself out there talking sense back at them. You can be the suit, let Ryan be the smart guy, leave the food fight to conservative new media, and everything will work out just fine for you.
Postscript
Don’t be a petty ass hat with your vanquished opponents Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Make sure they both get prime time speeches at the convention. They are both better than you at speaking to the Conservative Ascendancy. You will need their help “energizing the base.”
| Share the genius : | Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook |
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
What Ted Nugent and Jim Treacher Teach Us
Both Ted Nugent and Jim Treacher are obviously persons of great import … they both have WikiPedia pages! I, alas, do not. Thus, I do not know either of them, nor can I know if they know one another. Thus is the great 21st century class division between the WikiPediad class and WikiPedialess class.
Your humble WikiPedialess correspondent can, however, provide the following thumbnail sketch biographies.
Nugent is the ‘Motor City Madman’ of Rock ‘N Roll, with a side interest in hunting large animals and a history of copious volumes of casual hetereosexual sex. I’m going out on a limb here, and putting Nugent squarely in the Libertarian half of the big Conservative tent.
Jim Treacher is the blogger with a regular gig at the Daily Caller behind this avatar …
Combining the Ward Cleaver vibe of the avatar with what I gather from his writing, I imagine a young Treacher as a kind of Libertarian-curious social conservative. In any event, he now regularly checks all the ideological boxes of the classically conservative fusion, and does so with a great sense of humor in his writing.
==
In the past 48 hours or so, both of these stalwart conservatives have made mighty contributions to the all-important goal of ridding the republic of the Empty Suit Known as Barack Hussein Obama. Taken together, they are a kind of Yin and Yang of the attitude conservatives will need to adopt to be effective in the current election season. The composite can be labeled the Happy Warrior – Mark Steyn’s long time National Review ‘chair,’ btw.
Ted Nugent gave us the Yin of “Take No Prisoners, Give No Quarter” directness, in remarks to the National Rifle Association (NRA). The overheated media reaction is the proof of its effectiveness. Team Leftie has enjoyed a monopoly on abrasive political speech for decades. They never imagined this Alinskyite technique would be turned back on them (Rule 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up"). Conservatives at all levels should learn from, and apply the lessons of Nugent's example.
Then Jim Treacher mounted a Yang assault (good humor and good cheer) with his reporting on BHO’s prior experience with the canine culinary arts. When Barry the Chosen One was riding high in 2008, flush with ObamaGirl videos going viral and Axelrod plants fainting at campaign rallies, they could not imagine Rule 5 of the Alinsky playbook would ever be turned on them ("Ridicule is man's most potent weapon”).
This is the Yin and Yang composite – at least attitudinally - that will save the republic from the scourge of the contemptible Left. And it is truly a matter of attitude, not a actual behavior. The bright line that will distinguish “us” from “them” in the current ideological battle is actual violence and property damage. Just ‘google’ (God I hate that word as a verb) “arrests TEA Party” and “arrests Occupy Wall Street” to understand my point.
Those who observed today that these dramas are distractions from the real issues – including notable Happy Warrior Newt Gingrich on Sean Hannity’s radio program today – miss the point. The Alinskyite mockery and the issues are both indispensable ingredients for success. The former is a tool for insinuating the latter into the minds of the voting masses – those this blog labels “clueless independents.”
Nugent hit the issues at a macro level, if not a detailed level (but then, again, can we expect policy details to be the job of the “Motor City Madman”?) “Good solid B+”. We need more of it.
Treacher hit the mockery button brilliantly, spawning a day of electronic frivolity that surely has Barry curled up in the fetal position in the Lincoln Bedroom this evening.
Somebody find the Establishment GOP and wake them up from their nap. It’s time to earn all that dough grass roots conservatives have sent them over the years.
Alinsky’s Rule 11 … "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
Paul Ryan’s plan is a tepid start for clueless independents to start to swallow.
Your humble WikiPedialess correspondent can, however, provide the following thumbnail sketch biographies.
Nugent is the ‘Motor City Madman’ of Rock ‘N Roll, with a side interest in hunting large animals and a history of copious volumes of casual hetereosexual sex. I’m going out on a limb here, and putting Nugent squarely in the Libertarian half of the big Conservative tent.
Jim Treacher is the blogger with a regular gig at the Daily Caller behind this avatar …
Combining the Ward Cleaver vibe of the avatar with what I gather from his writing, I imagine a young Treacher as a kind of Libertarian-curious social conservative. In any event, he now regularly checks all the ideological boxes of the classically conservative fusion, and does so with a great sense of humor in his writing.
==
In the past 48 hours or so, both of these stalwart conservatives have made mighty contributions to the all-important goal of ridding the republic of the Empty Suit Known as Barack Hussein Obama. Taken together, they are a kind of Yin and Yang of the attitude conservatives will need to adopt to be effective in the current election season. The composite can be labeled the Happy Warrior – Mark Steyn’s long time National Review ‘chair,’ btw.
Ted Nugent gave us the Yin of “Take No Prisoners, Give No Quarter” directness, in remarks to the National Rifle Association (NRA). The overheated media reaction is the proof of its effectiveness. Team Leftie has enjoyed a monopoly on abrasive political speech for decades. They never imagined this Alinskyite technique would be turned back on them (Rule 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up"). Conservatives at all levels should learn from, and apply the lessons of Nugent's example.
Then Jim Treacher mounted a Yang assault (good humor and good cheer) with his reporting on BHO’s prior experience with the canine culinary arts. When Barry the Chosen One was riding high in 2008, flush with ObamaGirl videos going viral and Axelrod plants fainting at campaign rallies, they could not imagine Rule 5 of the Alinsky playbook would ever be turned on them ("Ridicule is man's most potent weapon”).
This is the Yin and Yang composite – at least attitudinally - that will save the republic from the scourge of the contemptible Left. And it is truly a matter of attitude, not a actual behavior. The bright line that will distinguish “us” from “them” in the current ideological battle is actual violence and property damage. Just ‘google’ (God I hate that word as a verb) “arrests TEA Party” and “arrests Occupy Wall Street” to understand my point.
Those who observed today that these dramas are distractions from the real issues – including notable Happy Warrior Newt Gingrich on Sean Hannity’s radio program today – miss the point. The Alinskyite mockery and the issues are both indispensable ingredients for success. The former is a tool for insinuating the latter into the minds of the voting masses – those this blog labels “clueless independents.”
Nugent hit the issues at a macro level, if not a detailed level (but then, again, can we expect policy details to be the job of the “Motor City Madman”?) “Good solid B+”. We need more of it.
Treacher hit the mockery button brilliantly, spawning a day of electronic frivolity that surely has Barry curled up in the fetal position in the Lincoln Bedroom this evening.
Somebody find the Establishment GOP and wake them up from their nap. It’s time to earn all that dough grass roots conservatives have sent them over the years.
Alinsky’s Rule 11 … "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
Paul Ryan’s plan is a tepid start for clueless independents to start to swallow.
| Share the genius : | Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook |
Posted by
LibertyAtStake
at
8:08 PM
What Ted Nugent and Jim Treacher Teach Us
2012-04-18T20:08:00-04:00
LibertyAtStake
#Occupy|2012 Election|2nd Amendment|Alinsky|Obama|TEA Party|
Comments
Labels:
#Occupy,
2012 Election,
2nd Amendment,
Alinsky,
Obama,
TEA Party
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
The Numbers Game (Barry’s Number is Up)
Numbers are detached, ruthless arbiters. LAS knows this from a lifetime of trying to
makes ends meet. It’s no coincidence LAS
deeply appreciates the song Bittersweet Symphony, by the Verve.
'Cause it's a bittersweet symphony, this life
Trying to make ends meet
You're a slave to money then you die
==
Somehow, I don’t think the Empty Suit Known as Barack Hussein Obama shares my appreciation of this song’s sentiment. Possibly handed the tuition for an elite education by the parents of convicted domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, definitely handed his ‘dream house’ by the convicted criminal Tony Rezko, and certainly rushed up the political ladder by the a Chicago machine universally recognized as the very model of political corruption; let’s just say what we know of his history (and there’s still a lot we don’t know – unreleased transcripts, etc.) looks like a charmed life.
My point is … I don’t think The One He Was Waiting For ever really sweated the numbers. The proof is the reckless abandon with which his administration has run up $5,000,000,000,000 ($5 TRILLION) in national debt across a mere three federal budget years (two of them not actually constrained by a budget, thanks to his fellow Democrat hacks in Congress - especially Dingy Harry Reid's Senate Democrat caucus). This rookie ideologue “inherited” a national deficit of approximately $10T from all the previous Presidents combined since 1789, and ran it up to $15T - a 50% increase in practically no time at all! Taking into consideration the timeline units, that’s slightly 74 times worse (as opposed to 72 times worse, just to be accurate) than taking a $10,000 household debt run up over six (6) years up to $15,000 in a single (1) year. Trust me, I did the math. Bottom line … I don’t think this clown Barry cares much about the numbers.
==
LAS notes BHO should probably start caring about the numbers now, though. Because the numbers foretell bad news for the only thing he really cares about: re-election. Because he’s a Leftist ideologue who clearly needs two, not merely one, term in the most powerful office on Earth to ‘fundamentally transform’ my republic.
==
A few numbers to contemplate in the wee hours, Barry …
414 – 0: House of Representatives vote REJECTING Barry’s budget for this year.
97 – 0: Senate vote REJECTING Barry’s budget for last year. (note: Dingy Harry Reid will not bring Barry's budget up for a vote this year. Mark it.)
235 – 193: House of Representatives vote IN FAVOR OF Paul Ryan’s budget for this year. (note: Still waiting for Dingy Harry Reid to bring a budget to the Senate Floor for this year. Won't happen. Mark it.)
Conclusion: You, Barry, are a pathetic little joke in matters of budgeting.
==
But these are not the numbers you really care about, are they Barry? Of course not. Your ideology informs you the
The Electoral College will weigh in this November. But there are several twists and turns to navigate between now and then, which will play into the final electoral vote tally, aren’t there? A very big one is this number, isn’t it: 5 – 4? FIVE TO FREAKIN’ FOUR! How many baseball games have been decided by this slim margin? Perhaps by umpire error or omission?
Or wrestling matches?
In the constitutional corner … representing the constitution and the separation of powers doctrine … 4 justices appointed by Republicans. In the Leftist corner … 4 justices appointed by Democrats. Hanging on the ring apron wandering around aimlessly … Justice Kennedy.
==
It became too close for comfort when your Solicitor General was handed his ass in oral arguments, didn’t it, Barry? His ass.
So, you have embarrassed yourself over the past two days on this all important 5-4 number, haven’t you, Barry?
Yesterday - in the Rose Garden, of all places (what, no lab coats?), you presumed to instruct the Supreme Court that it should uphold your signature legislation, ObamaCare, which you characterized – in a lie – as being passed by a significant majority of Congress. Either you know the ObamaCare vote was a party line vote (making you a lying demagogue) or you don’t remember that it was (making you an idiot). Either way … simply embarrassingly stupid. I mean, for a guy who was supposed to slow the rising of the oceans and everything, you know.
Then, today … you attempted a ‘clarification’ and revealed your true self. Tiny … pathetic … Leftist ideological to the Nth.
==
It’s over for you, Barry. As of now. LAS marks it. I will save the “iron triangle” of gasoline prices, CPI, and unemployment for future posts. You are toast. Period. End of sentence.
Tonight, I shall simply modify Richard Ashcroft’s lyrics as follows:
'Cause it's a bittersweet symphony, this life==
Seed of Saul Alinsky
You're slave to your ideology
Enjoy, dear reader.
Update 4/4/12
LAS likes how Limbaugh is explaining Barry's erratic, hyperbolic, and cynical statements of late. It is an open electoral appeal to the truly ignorant and dumb. So, that's it then ... 2012 will demonstrate just how dumb my republic has finally become. Dumb enough to re-elect a failed demagogue? We shall see.
| Share the genius : | Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook |
Thursday, March 29, 2012
The Lynching of George Zimmerman
Or 'framing' for the rhetorically squeamish.
==
Q: What happened to due process in this country?
A: It has been killed by left wing politics.
==
American left wing politics in 2012 is the politics of Saul
Alinsky, author of Rules For Radicals:
“Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It and Polarize It.”
The American political Left in 2012 is in full control of
the Democrat party, writes and produces the journalistic malpractice given to
you daily by the corrupt and biased mainstream media, is grossly statistically
overrepresented inside the entertainment industry that feeds you your popular ‘culture,’
and wages politics as instructed by Saul Alinksy. Ruthlessly.
The politics of the Left really only has one macro template. Divide the mob into factions, stoke divisions
amongst these factions, and capitalize on the anger and chaos to further the
political agenda. Occupy Wall Street was, is, and will be their application of this
template to stoking resentments over economic class divisions (class
warfare). The Sandra Fluke ‘contraception
activist’ comedy was a failed attempt to wage politics by gender warfare. It probably worked out so poorly for them
because it wasn’t carefully planned as a proactive chess move. Rather it was a hastily thrown together
counter-move to the blowback from their attempt to dictate religious conscience
to the Catholic Church (war on Christianity).
They will surely come up with something else to cover both of these
bases soon. It’s an election year.
When the George Zimmerman / Trayvon Martin story first broke
as a national story a couple of weeks ago, Team Leftie immediately jumped to
the conclusion it had been presented with the holy grail for their politics of
division: race warfare.
Initial reports contained but two notable facts: a black
teenager had been shot. Presumably by a
white man, because that’s how George Zimmerman was uniformly described in
account after account in the initial days.
Murder in cold blood?
Self-defense? No one could possibly have an informed
opinion except the police who responded and the grand jury that was already in
the process of being convened.
But Team Leftie instantly knew what they had. And they followed the Alinsky game plan with
ruthless abandon. No need to wait for
the grand jury report. This is a time to
whip up the mob. As Team Leftie All-Star
Rahm Emanuel famously stated: “Never let
a crisis go to waste.”
The corrupt and biased liberal media distributed some
photographs for us to puzzle over. The
photos they chose to highlight were tailor made to establish the desired
bias. The photo of Treyvon Martin was five
years old, and depicted him at the age of 12, rather than the 17 years he had
attained by the time of his demise. The
photo chosen to depict Zimmerman to the nation was even older – seven years old
– and was literally a mug shot from a seven year old arrest.
The Zimmerman mug shot did have one interesting effect on
the national discourse. He immediately went
from ‘white’ to ‘white hispanic’ in news accounts. Glad we could clear that up … it really helps
us get to the bottom of what happened that night.
We were also immediately treated to a factual falsehood,
allowed to go uncorrected for days, that was off by a factor of ten. We were told over and again Zimmerman had
called police in his role as neighborhood watchman 46 times in a single year, so we
would naturally reach the conclusion he was an overzealous vigilante. It turned out the correct fact was 46 calls in ten years. Do reporters check the
facts they acquire from other reporters anymore? You know the answer.
Day by day, new information has leaked out deflating Team Leftie’s
preferred narrative. As much as they want
Treyvon to be the innocent martyr that sparks a race war, the more we learn the
less there is to like about the young man.
We now know he was suspended from school three times, possibly a small
time drug dealer, and just not very presentable or particularly polite on Facebook and Twitter. We of course also know Zimmerman’s history is
not as pure as the driven snow – arrests and anger management classes being a
part of that history. The point is not
to have a contest over character – biased or otherwise – but rather to get to
the bottom of what happened that night.
The information coming out in recent days on that score is
not helpful to team Leftie’s narrative either.
Based on what has been coming out, it is likely this is what actually
happened: Martin ‘jumped’ Zimmerman from behind after Zimmerman had stopped
following him, Martin beat the crap out of Zimmerman with his fists, banged
Zimmerman’s head against the pavement repeatedly, and made threats suggesting
he would kill Zimmerman with Zimmerman’s weapon after Zimmerman was to be
rendered unconscious. In the struggle,
Zimmerman’s weapon shot Martin dead.
Sounds like it could be self-defense under any reasonable
standard to me. Why not let the grand
jury deliberate?
Because deliberation and due process is not to be found in Team Leftie DNA …
Deliberation – at least not when it comes to politically
exploiting crises – is not in the DNA of the Community-Agitator-Chief himself, the Empty Suit Known as Barack Hussein Obama. BHO, failing to learn the lesson of the Beer
Summit, disgracefully waded into another local matter knowing nothing of the facts – fanning the
flames of racial division with the racialist code words ‘Trayvon looks like my
son’ (paraphrasing). Somebody insert
this nitwit’s picture into the next edition of Webster’s next to ‘unpresidential.’
Deliberation in these matters is definitely not in the DNA
of the Rev. Al Sharpton – who actually skipped his own mother’s funeral to dash
to the scene of the crisis du jour.
Because exploiting racial tensions is what he does for a living – ever since
participating in the fabrication of Tawana Brawley’s false charges, for which
he has never been held to account.
Do you think deliberation in these matters is in the DNA of
the New Black Panthers? They have distributed
‘George Zimmerman Wanted Dead or Alive’ posters and have hired a vigilante army
to ensure the reward is collected.
Apparently not noticing Zimmerman is obviously in hiding (you
know, since the Panthers probably thought to look for him at home first), the
dimwitted Spike Lee re-tweeted what he thought was Zimmerman’s home
address. It turned out to be the wrong
address. It was the address of an
elderly couple who subsequently had to leave their home to hide out in a hotel
due to the volume of ‘hate speech’ thus directed their way. We can only hope they hire a good lawyer who
will sue Lee for everything he owns.
You, dear reader, can browse the links in the footnote on
your own, to fill out my case. Do so
deliberately, please.
This is the Left. It
is mob rule, plain and simple. The Left
is in firm control of your entire Executive branch and the Senate half of the
Legislative branch. If you do not
correct this situation in the election of 2012, it is beyond my ability to
articulate the pitch chaos you will be served by the Left in the subsequent
four years.
Footnote
Related links …
New Black Panther vigilantism
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/24/New-Black-Panther-Party-Issues-Wanted-Dead-or-Alive
Spike Lee, Notable Nitwit #1
Just the facts ma’am #1
Gangsta Trayvon #1
Spike Lee, Notable Nitwit #2
Just the facts ma’am #2
Gangsta Treyvon #2
Race War Satire (In case you need a laugh at this point)
Do We Need a Photo Summit?
Oh, That Post-Racial Barack
Mob Rule #1 – Walgreen’s Looting Edition
MSM bias #1 – Attack the Republican Black Guy
Congressional Black Caucus Madness #1
Congressional Black Caucus Madness #2
Congressional Black Caucus Madness #3
MSM Bias #2 – Cross Examine the Black Friend
Just the Facts Maa’am #3
Mob Rule #2 – Social Media Edition
Do We Need a Skittles Summit Now?
| Share the genius : | Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook |
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
The Left's War on Conservative Women, Hypocrisy, Talk Radio, Obama, and Alinsky
Radio man Chris Plante, executing his daily
By now, we are all familiar with the phony and ongoing 'War on Women' narrative - which I began chronicling with my 3/6/12 post 'The Evolution of a Narrative': Team Leftie attempt to shove contraception down Catholic Church's collective throat, Team Leftie polling identifies principled backlash in the republic, Team Leftie devises change of subject to free contraception services for self-entitled scholarship law students who somehow can't afford $9/mo at the local pharmacy, Team Leftie trots out the mathematically challenged nymphomaniac for a political circus, Rush Limbaugh gives his usual satirical commentary on current events and utters a word not banned by the FCC and not on George Carlin's list of 7 deadly words, Team Leftie leader Barack Hussein Obama comforts the previously mentioned nymphomaniac, Team Leftie launches all out attack on Limbaugh in vain attempt to drive him off the air.
==
Plante’s question to his audience arose from an appearance on the David Letterman show by Michelle Obama. Plante astutely connected the dots between the inconsistencies in the White House’s recent rhetoric regarding ‘civil discourse’ in politics, and Letterman’s record of applying the word ‘slutty’ to Sarah Palin. (And also making crude jokes about her teenage daughter Willow).
Plante and his audience leaned hard into the obvious explanation – hypocrisy. The phony ‘War on Women’ recently invented by Team Leftie is actually a one sided ‘War on Conservative Women’ Team Leftie has been waging for years. Because Team Leftie expects all women to stay on their political reservation, and any woman straying from the reservation is fair game for a lynching.
That’s all true enough. But it omits one key insight about who these people in the White House are – Team Leftie All-Stars each and every one – which is touched on in this email I sent Mr. Plante contemporaneously.
The message of the WH on 'civil discourse' is they are dyed-in-wool *Alinsyites*. (sic)
*All that matters is the fight* *Hold your enemy to his rules*
I see now I misspelled Alinskyite – meaning dedicated followers of Saul Alinsky and his Rules for Radicals. This “bible” to which they bitterly cling instructs them to constantly stir the pot to foment divisions among the people, to exploit for their own ideological advantage. Winning the ideological fight is all that matters. Everything else is a distant second at best – including quaint old notions like intellectual consistency.
They have 12 rules in this “bible” of theirs. Rule 4 is very instructive right now …
RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
Translation in this context: Exhort your enemy to stick to ‘civil discourse’ – that is, *sit down and shut up* - while you retain the ability to savage your enemy.
LAS’ advice to the conservatives: Refuse to *sit down and shut up* ... just don’t lose your ethical compass as you do so. Two things in particular will occur: (1) as the argument unfolds, Team Leftie hypocrisy will become increasingly apparent to the rest of the republic, (2) Rule 4 will be turned on Team Leftie – they all have glass chins.
| Share the genius : | Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








